logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.06.28 2013노496
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below to Defendant B (limited to eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, and 80 hours of community service order) is too unhued and unreasonable.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one year of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The prosecutor's assertion that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant was investigated by the investigative agency as the same crime, and committed the crime of this case at the same time. However, the defendant did not have the record of punishment for the same crime, and recognized the crime of this case, and thereby seriously reflects his/her mistake. The crime of this case committed in order to raise hospital expenses for his/her father who suffered from various diseases, and there are other circumstances that may be somewhat taken into account in the circumstance, including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, and other various circumstances that form the condition for sentencing in this case. Thus, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

B. As to Defendant A’s assertion, the Defendant agreed with the victim of the crime of fraud and committed each of the crimes of this case, which seriously reflects his mistake. However, as to the violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act among each of the crimes of this case, the size of the game room operated by the Defendant is considerable, as to the fraud, and as to the fraud, the Defendant had the record of punishment for the same crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. Thus, the appeal by the defendant A and the prosecutor is without merit.

arrow