beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 6,800,000 with the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 4, 2017 to August 17, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 9, 2012, the Plaintiff paid a deposit amount of KRW 20 million to Nonparty D with respect to the 16.74 square meters of the Class II neighborhood living facilities, 16.74 square meters of the Class II neighborhood living facilities, the prefabricated type 23.8 square meters and the prefabricated type 26.4 square meters of the Class II neighborhood living facilities, the prefabricated type 26.4 square meters of the prefabricated group, the prefabricated type 26.4 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”), the lease term of KRW 220 million (payment on October 29, 201), the lease term of the building to lease from October 29, 2012 to October 29, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant lease contract”), and the lease deposit was to be received from Nonparty D (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”). The above lease contract was to be made from 20 years of age 1,2014 to October 1, 2014.
B. After that, on September 4, 2014, the Plaintiff sent a “written request for extension of lease” to the said D, which demanded the renewal of the instant lease agreement, and the said written request reached the said D around that time.
C. The Defendants purchased the instant building from the foregoing D on September 8, 2014, and subsequently registered the transfer of co-ownership on October 16, 2014, respectively, on the instant building. D.
Meanwhile, on April 29, 2016, the Plaintiff continued not to pay a rent to the Defendants from March 29, 2016 (the rent for the period from March 29, 2016 to April 28, 2016). Since September 29, 2016, the instant building was not used or profit-making in accordance with the original purpose of the instant lease agreement. On January 3, 2017, the Plaintiff delivered the instant building to the Defendants.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the said D, a lessor of the instant lease agreement, is the place of business of the instant building.