(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.08.29 2014고단710

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.08.29 2014고단710

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 27, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Suwon District Court Ansan branch on September 27, 2013 and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 10, 2014.

The defendant was a person who worked at a car E agency in the Gu's 1st floor in Ansan-si, and around May 2006, the defendant sold a ice vehicle to the victim C with the victim's friendship.

The Defendant married with F on May 7, 1993, and was married with F on January 25, 2007, and was not a regular business employee of Franchis in the state of being unable to sell an automobile under his own name due to the cancellation of the business membership code from Franchising on January 25, 2007, and around 2007, 300 million won occurred, and thus, he lives in the form of so-called return prevention, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to complete the payment, he was the director of Franchising E, and was able to obtain money from the victim.

1. Around May 17, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The Defendant shall pay off the payment for the vehicle under the four names after the vehicle was delivered to the victim, if he/she could receive the payment for the vehicle under the four names.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay even if he was given a vehicle installment in the name of the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained a loan of KRW 30 million from the new card company in the name of the victim to the account in the name of the victim after being notified of the new card number, the term of validity of the new card, and the resident registration number, and transferred the purchase price of the vehicle under the name of the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant. The Defendant did not pay the purchase price, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent

2. On May 30, 2007, the Defendant called the victim at the above agency and called the victim at the agency on a one-year basis.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.10.22 2014고단574

-수원지방법원 2014.12.01 2014노5370

-수원지방법원 2014.05.28 2014고단1015

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.12.19 2013고단975

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.05.24 2012고단1541