The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant had to receive money and opened several passbooks as if he were a corporate employee; (b) the Defendant opened a bank account; (c) the point in which the Defendant opened the bank account; and (d) confirmed that the transfer of the means of access could be punished at the time of opening the bank account; and (c) the Defendant directly delivered the means of access to name-in-facts; and (d) the Defendant was 300,000 won at the time of opening the bank account, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant was aware that the Defendant was aware that his act was delivering the means of access

2. Evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the job offer advertisement that the defendant seeks office staff at the F website, in particular, (1) the defendant was allowed to contact with the representative's contact point, and the unsatisfyed name falsely called the representative's contact, and (2) the court below's determination that the defendant opened a corporate bank account and delivered the passbook, debit card, andOTP to the bank account, on the ground that the unsatisfyer who opened the bank account and opened the bank account and opened the bank account for only one week, and opened the bank account and opened the bank account for the purpose of collecting non-satisfy materials. (3) The court below's determination that the defendant was not guilty of the facts charged was just 1.2 million won per month during the three-month management period, and then received the monthly wage of 1.8 million won per month after the employment of office staff, and directly received the payment for opening the bank account and the delivery of the means of access. (3) The court below's determination that the defendant was not guilty of the facts charged.

Therefore, prosecutors.