1. The plaintiffs' primary claim and the plaintiff A manager council's preliminary claim are all dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The establishment of superficies with superficies on Defendant 1) Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 11,821m2, E’s land for factory, 15,538m2, F’s land for factory, 377m2, G land for factory, 11m2, and H land for factory (hereinafter “Before the instant merger”).

D) The land for factory shall be 27,770 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) after the merger on December 24, 2004.

(2) On November 6, 1998, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City as a person with superficies on a part of the land prior to the annexation of this case, and the purpose of which is to possess a subway road is to determine the scope as part of underground and ground, and the duration of which has been completed from November 6, 1998 to the continuation of subway facilities, and on September 14, 2004, the person with superficies transferred to the defendant.

(3) With respect to the incorporated area of the instant land, the Defendant as a person with superficies on December 28, 2004, and as to the registered area of 41.92 square meters, the scope of the registered area of the instant land was registered as “the ownership of an elevator facility for disabled persons,” and the establishment registration of divided superficies was completed between April 65 and 14.9 meters above ground, and the duration was from December 27, 2004 to the continuation of subway facilities. B. From April 1, 2014 to the third underground floor of the instant land, the Defendant installed and leased a commercial building in sequence 1, 2, c, 4, and 1 (hereinafter “instant commercial building”). (hereinafter “instant commercial building”). From April 1, 2014, the Defendant, in sequence, installed and leased a commercial building in the part on the instant line (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

(c) Plaintiff A management council (hereinafter “Plaintiff Council”).

A698 household(attached Form 1) as an aggregate building constructed on the land of this case is the same as the building listed in the attached Table 1;

hereinafter referred to as “instant building”

The management body consisting of the owners of the building A-25, and the owners of the building A-225, and the Plaintiff C are co-owners holding the share of the building A-105-9/10 of the building A-10. [The grounds for recognition: Facts without dispute, evidence A-1 through A5, evidence A7 (Evidence Nos. 1 through 5), video, and the whole pleadings.