1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Clar 300C Vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), and the Defendant is the person who operates the E station in Jeju City D.

B. Around 12:38 on May 24, 2016, the Plaintiff’s representative director F was operating the instant vehicle and became gas station at the gas station.

C. The Plaintiff, at the above station, requested the Defendant’s employees to stop oil with the view to stopping the instant vehicle, which is a “transporting vehicle,” but the Defendant’s employees paid 67.14 liter to the instant vehicle.

(hereinafter the above mixed high school is referred to as “instant mixed high school”). D.

The Plaintiff, after completing the gas station oil and driving around approximately 200 meters, parked to inspect the vehicle of this case, and caused vibration to inspect the vehicle of this case, and then recognized the fact that gasoline not via the vehicle of this case, but through the oil station receipt, and operated the vehicle of this case. However, the Plaintiff requested G for the maintenance because the movement does not turn on.

E. G exchanged projectors, high-tension pumps, fuel pumps, fuel dust, etc. of the instant vehicle, and subsequently claimed KRW 17,582,180 as repair costs to the Plaintiff around October 25, 2016.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 through 7 evidence, Eul 2 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

(a) A person engaged in the principal supplying oil may be liable to pay the oil after verifying the type of fuel used by the vehicle that is the subject of the oil, and selecting the fuel that is appropriate for it;

However, according to the above facts, the defendant's employees neglected the above duty of care and oil paid to the instant vehicle using light oil as fuel, thereby causing the instant mixed high-water. Thus, the defendant, the employer of the above employees, is liable to compensate for damages caused by the instant mixed high-water.

B. Whether liability is limited (negative) The defendant is responsible for the defendant in consideration of the negligence on the part of the plaintiff.