Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2013. 10. 11. 18:40경 서울 구로구 B에 있는 C 운영의 D에서 C와 임급체불 문제로 시비를 하던 중 C의 신고를 받고 출동한 서울구로경찰서 E지구대 소속 순경 F로부터 C의 퇴거 요구가 있으니 위 D에서 나가 달라는 말을 듣자 위 F에게 “씹할 나 집행유예 기간이야, 네들 내가 가만 안둔다. 나중에 보자”라고 말을 하여 위 F의 신체 등에 위해를 줄 것 같이 하고, 그로 인해 위 F 등에 의해서 공무집행방해 혐의로 현행범체포되어 위 E지구대로 인치되자 위 F의 허벅지 부분을 발로 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of FF 112, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant again commits the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, while committing the instant crime.

However, there is no other criminal record that the defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in 2010, for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in 2012, for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in 2012, and two years

In addition, if the defendant was dismissed without receiving the benefits and asked to resist it, the defendant's report was led by the business owner, and the police officer called out was simply assaulted during the process of resisting to the police officer, and considered the circumstances.

As can be seen, the defendant shall be sentenced to the same punishment as the disposition, comprehensively taking into account the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, methods of committing the crime, the circumstances after the crime, and criminal records.