The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was that the Defendant, due to the statutory restraint of the victim D (e.g., E) led to the devoking of the relationship with the same industry, he thought that the Defendant was guilty by the victim, and that he was aware of the morale. A.

On July 201, 201, the Defendant posted a phone call to G, which is a sports-based team of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”), at an unsound place, thereby openly impairing the reputation of the victim by stating that “I” is “I” if I wanted to file a complaint against E in fraud at this time.

B. From July 201 to August 2011, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home located in Gwangju City, had a talk about the victim’s issues of operation of I and F, and had a talked about the victim. As a result, the Defendant publicly damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact, stating that “the victim’s talked with the victim’s satisfe” was “the same satfe with the satch satfe”.

C. From February 2013 to April 2013, the Defendant openly damaged the victim’s reputation by publicly stating the fact that “E is the same mos, the mos, the mos, and the mosss, the mos, the mos, the mos, the mos, and the moss, the mos, which were employed as F’s internal audits in an in-house audit place, were recorded several times with the JJ, which had been employed as F’s internal audits in an in-house conversation.”

On June 6, 2013, the Defendant changed from K and telephone calls at the Defendant’s home located in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, to “Fraud against the victim”.

Chewing

E. A previous conviction changed due to the fraud, and the victim’s reputation was openly damaged by stating the fact that the previous conviction changed due to Chewing gue, or that she is a 6 criminal, or a son’s special, etc.

2. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant did not speak G that the Defendant would harm D’s reputation. Since I, J, and K are close to D, the Defendant is not able to spread one’s horses to others. Thus, there is no possibility that one’s horses may spread to others.

3. Determination

A. The facts charged

(b).