logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.09.17 2014나4709
건물명도등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3.Paragraph 1. of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 19, 2010, the Plaintiffs determined and leased the lease deposit amount of KRW 25 million, KRW 230 million, KRW 230,000,000,000, KRW 180,000 (excluding value-added tax), management expenses (excluding value-added tax) as KRW 180,000,000 (excluding value-added tax) from among the buildings indicated in the attached list jointly owned by Plaintiff A 3/4 and Plaintiff B as shares of KRW 1/4.

B. On November 11, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a claim against the defendant for the payment of unjust enrichment on the name of the above part of the building and the rent and rent of 2 or more times as the court 2013da 44846, and against the defendant, the court 200, the defendant 200, the aggregate of the rent, management fee and value-added tax amount of 96,753,06 won [2,728,000 won, value-added tax of 230,000 won, value-added tax of 230,000 won, 200,000 won, 30,000 won, 36,000 won x 46,000 won, 20,000 won, 306,000 won, 9636,000 won, x 1636,005,000 won, 20636,31636.

C. On July 11, 2013, prior to the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendant is out of the charge charged with the plaintiffs with the UN ENH case.

arrow