1. Promissory notes, No. 135, 2013, drawn up by the Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff on September 17, 2013.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company established on March 7, 1986 for the purpose of bankruptcy, real estate leasing, sale, and introduction of construction materials.

B. C, on November 2, 2007, was appointed as the representative director of the Plaintiff and resigned on April 7, 2008, was appointed on April 7, 2008, and resigned on May 27, 2009, and was reappointed on August 6, 2009, and was dismissed again on November 30, 201.

D on November 1, 2007, the Plaintiff was appointed as an auditor and retired on March 31, 2010.

C. In fact, E, F, G, H, I, and J have never been held at the Plaintiff’s temporary general meeting and the board of directors of the board of directors, the extraordinary general meeting and minutes of the board of directors were prepared on November 17, 201 as if the resolution was made to appoint the director of G, J, H, and I, and around that time, prepared a list of shareholders with no authority to do so, E, K, G, J, J, and H as shareholders, and changed the list of shareholders several times.

After that, the resolution to appoint E as a director or representative director of the Plaintiff was prepared on May 29, 2013, and the minutes of the Plaintiff’s general meeting and the board of directors’ meeting (hereinafter “resolution, etc.”) were accordingly registered as the representative director in the Plaintiff’s corporate register from June 5, 2013 to November 21, 2013.

E. On September 17, 2013, E, as the Plaintiff’s representative director, issued to the Defendant a promissory note (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) with the face value of KRW 700 million per each of the Defendant, including the Defendant, the date of issuance, the date of payment, the place of payment, the place of payment, and the place of payment, of the Plaintiff’s representative director, and immediately following the issuance, a notary public stating the terms of acceptance of compulsory execution based on the instant promissory note (hereinafter “instant notarial deed”) signed a notarial deed No. 135, 2013 (hereinafter “instant notarial deed”). However, the said notarial deed contains the Defendant’s name as the addressee, the Plaintiff’s corporate name as the issuer, the Plaintiff’s representative director as the Plaintiff’s representative director, and E affixed the seal of the Plaintiff’s representative director.

F. The defendant shall do so.