(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고정49

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고정49

업무방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:00 on January 14, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s private road traffic restriction by force by means of force, such as attaching a vehicle on the part of the victim E and Pokes in the vicinity of the construction site, on the ground that it is difficult for the victim to drive the vehicle due to the victim’s construction, on the ground that the victim’s road traffic restriction site in order to prevent the fall and collapse risk of the downhill of the downhill of the road and the downhill of the 7 lots of the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each letter of commitment to the preparation of E and F;

1. Application of a copy of a private road traffic restriction permit, a field guidance sign photograph, and statutes governing field work photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act guilty E of the order of provisional payment was based on the victim’s delegation, and Article 334(1) of the same Act demanded H to build a private road traffic restriction construction, and F was put into the said construction site in accordance with the direction of the user who received the said request.

In addition, the Defendant cannot properly know the legality of the above construction work and the possibility of punishing the acts involved therein, and tried to identify contact information by referring to “illegal construction and police report,” and referring to “illegal construction and police report.” The Defendant’s expression “F, which is frighten, is responsible for an article, must undergo an investigation,” constitutes an exercise of power, and the Defendant’s essential click work appears in the construction work.

참조조문

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2015.09.24 2015노542

-수원지방법원 2013.01.30 2012노4519

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.07.12 2013고정102

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.04.24 2013고정457

-대전지방법원 2015.06.25 2015고단403