logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.02.04 2020노865
명예훼손
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

However, for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The content of the instant inducement is not false, but is not false, and even if not, it is a case where there is a considerable reason to believe that it is true and thus, illegality should be avoided.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The defendant's inducement distributed by the court below is "two lineal male in direct possession" with the next president kis.

3. (Minority)

. The merchants gather to cause enormous damage to the residents;

3. (Minority)

(a) have the honor to interfere with audit and inspection during the preceding quarter.

3. (Minority)

(b)the election campaign promises at the time of the election of the Chairperson have been set out in the Annex of the Private Document in order not to comply with one guidance;

In light of the aforementioned legal principles, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the grounds of appeal.

However, the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted by this court, namely, the Defendant stated as follows with respect to the part of “the next male 2 person’s second male 2’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’

However, the victim seems to have never made the above remarks, and the defendant is giving substantial damage to the residents of the merchant's mother.

With respect to the part "", the victim shall pay the health room cleaning cost of KRW 150,000 per month to the victim in a lump sum of KRW 200,000 per annum.

Now, the budget was set to replace the fright side of the sidewalk with the sidewalk block, and when replacing it to a wooden test, a flick 1,2860,000 won was applied to the flick, which had the flick flick, and entered as above.

However, the above circumstance alone reveals that the defendant suffered enormous damage to the residents in conspiracy with the merchants.

It is difficult to see, and the Defendant “Is to interfere with audit and inspection during the preceding quarter.”

A damaged person with respect to the part “” shall submit audit data.

arrow