The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months and by a fine of 5 million won for the crime No. 6 of the decision.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (the age of 51) were the legal marital relationship that was married around July 19, 2013, and the divorce lawsuit (the Jeonju District Court 2018ddan5118) was filed, but agreed to divorce by agreement.

On July 15, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Jeonju District Court's Jeonju Branch's Support, and the appellate court continued to be released from the Jeonju prison as the revocation of detention on September 28, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 20, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence.

The written indictment states that on September 28, 2014, the date of revocation of detention, the execution of the sentence was terminated by the previous prison on September 28, 2014, but since the above judgment is not yet finalized at the time of revocation of detention, it cannot be deemed that the execution of the sentence was terminated, and the judgment after revocation of detention became final and conclusive, and thus, the execution of the sentence

For the same reason, crimes Nos. 1 through 5 in the holding are crimes before the completion of punishment, not repeated crimes.

1. At around 20:00 on December 25, 2013, the Defendant suffered injury on the ground that, around 20:00 on December 25, 2013, the Defendant did not demand money from the victim’s residence located in the Jeonbuk-gun C Apartment-gun D, North Korea, to the victim. However, at around 20:0 on December 25, 2013, when the victim’s name was made one time and the face part of the victim’s face part was taken up on the floor, the head was excessively faced on the floor, and two times after the left part was removed, the Defendant sustained injury, such as “datums and tensions of the bones of trees” that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On February 26, 2014, the Defendant was injured at around 22:0 on February 26, 2014, at around 22:0, at the same place as the above 1. Subparag. 26, 2014, the Defendant refers to the victim as to whether he/she was suffering from the source that he/she intends to show the lebane,” and the victim was faced with two chemical parts located in a ward where the body part of the left part was tightly cut back, and the body part of the body part was sent back several times, and the victim was in line with the body of the victim, which requires approximately three weeks medical treatment.