1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

A thief (2013dan425) The Defendant, while working at a construction site located in C in C in Y in Yasan-si on May 2012, 201, was stolen by carrying 9.5 billion won of the market value of the victim D’s bareboat boom, wire-line boom, hand-Hand cutting machines, etc. in his/her kick onto his/her kick by using kicks.

On April 3, 2012, the Defendant stated that “On the front day of the F office located in Solomon Savings Bank, the Defendant would make a repayment three months after lending from the victim G, if he/she borrowed his/her name to obtain a loan from Solomon Savings Bank.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to repay the existing loans at the time, and there was no ability to pay wages to the employees even though the civil engineering work was conducted around that time, and thus, there was no intention or ability to repay the loans from the victims even if they were to receive the loans under their name.

As such, the Defendant, by falsely speaking the victim, had the victim borrow KRW 46,100,00 from the Solomon Savings Bank on the same day, and obtained the above loan from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

Fraud (2013 Highest 596)

A. From September 14:00 on September 9, 201, the Defendant stated that “A victim I’s accommodation located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu shall pay back to the victim not later than 20 days if I lend money to the victim.”

However, in fact, the original contractor was unable to pay personnel expenses with the money received from the original contractor as a result of a change in the design price during the process of the work, and the private financial company borrowed money. Therefore, even if the victim borrowed money, there was no intention or ability to pay the money within the period.

As such, the Defendant received 3 million won from the victim to the personal compromise account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.