All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment (one million won of a fine) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. We examine both the defendant and prosecutor’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing.

The defendant recognizes the crime of this case and reflects his wrong and has no record of criminal punishment until then.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is likely to fall into a house constructed to stabilize the residence of homeless people and damage the purpose of the public rental housing business. In particular, even if the defendant is fully aware of the illegality of the act of violating the Rental Housing Act as a real estate broker, it is highly likely that the crime of this case is committed.

In addition, considering the various circumstances, such as the profits acquired by the Defendant through the instant crime, the age, character and conduct, the environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, etc., as well as the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and is too heavy or too unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.