1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

3. The first instance.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is the 103 security guards' consent to the Busan Jin-gu C building in Busan, and the defendant was a resident of 103 dong 302.

B. On June 7, 2015, the Defendant discovered that the Defendant’s vehicle’s campaign site is attached to the Defendant’s vehicle, and resisted the Plaintiff as a security guard, and the dispute arose in the process.

At the time of the plaintiff, the defendant injured the plaintiff, such as the impairment of sacrife, sacrine, detailed sacrife, sacrine, tensions, etc., of sacrife, and the plaintiff suffered bodily injury by sacrine sacrine, etc.

(2) The following facts are revealed: (a) The Defendant’s aforementioned act’s act is deemed to be a harmful act by the Defendant; (b) the Plaintiff’s act is deemed to be a harmful act by the Plaintiff; and (c) the Plaintiff’s injury is deemed to be a harmful act by the Plaintiff; and (d) the Plaintiff’s injury is deemed to be a harmful act by the Plaintiff; and (e) the Plaintiff’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 through 6 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same

2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion caused damages to KRW 18,953,030 due to the Defendant’s harmful act (i.e., medical expenses of KRW 8,353,030,030,000,000,000). Thus, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for such damages.

B. Determination 1) Since the Defendant’s harmful act constitutes a tort against the Plaintiff, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred therefrom. 2) We examine the scope of compensation for damages.

(A) According to the evidence evidence Nos. 3 and 7 of the property damage (1) the Plaintiff stated the medical expenses of KRW 2,385,018 from June 7, 2015 to July 3, 2015 on the ground of the Plaintiff’s injury for the medical expenses of KRW 2,385,026 for the medical expenses of the first instance court (the period of hospitalization from June 8, 2015 to June 23, 2015). However, the medical expenses of KRW 2,385,018 are included in the calculation of the medical expenses of the above period as stated in the medical expenses payment confirmation (Evidence No. 3-1 of the evidence No. 3), since the Plaintiff received from D General Hospital for the aforementioned period from June 7, 2015 to July 3, 2015, the aforementioned expenses are KRW 2,385,026, and KRW 238,580,280.2.