logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.08.22 2013노1919
살인
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine years.

Seized one (Evidence No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (two years of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. It is acknowledged that the Defendant committed the instant crime by making use of a halk chain at the scene of the instant crime, in view of the fact that the Defendant both recognized the instant crime and violated it, and that the Defendant was discriminated against on the ground that it was against the payment of benefits during the process of payment of benefits to the victim and the Defendant. The Defendant immediately reported to the police immediately after the instant crime, and the victim voluntarily surrendered to the police, and the victim was not immediately dead as a result of the instant crime, but immediately after the instant crime, he did not immediately die, but was aware of being 4 weeks after the cerebrovascular surgery, and that there was no record of criminal punishment in the Republic of Korea.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant with the victim's head unbrupted and murdered by the victim's head. The crime of this case was committed by the defendant due to the cruelness of the method of the crime, and the defendant was discriminated against in the payment of the salary for the reason that it was the ship's satisfaction, even though there are no significant circumstances to make it clear that there was no special understanding of the defendant's payment of the salary, the act of murder in this case was committed by the murder in this case, the victim and his family members suffered a serious mental suffering in the course of the process of her death after her 3 operation to remove cerebrovascular from the crime of this case. Nevertheless, it seems that the defendant did not make a serious effort to reach an agreement with the victim's bereaved family members or recover damage, and it appears that the defendant did not make a serious effort to recover from the victim's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below.

arrow