1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of

[In light of the evidence submitted, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) the Plaintiff engaged in the duty of care in the non-party company for more than 30 years, with a pipe and other materials transport work repeatedly; (b) the Plaintiff’s duties are somewhat related to the Plaintiff’s work. However, there is no special external shock at the time of the occurrence of the injury or disease (such as the Plaintiff’s age, body, strength of work, and intensity of work). Of the injury or disease of this case, the remaining injury or disease except for the symptoms escape certificate of protruding signboards out of the injury or disease of this case is a representative escape disease; (c) the escape symptoms of protruding signboards have become worse and become worse; and (d) there is no natural shock or action during daily life; and (e) there is no other evidence that the Plaintiff’s request for removal from office can be dismissed due to the absence of sufficient evidence, such as gender, age, work experience, mental retardation, etc.; and (e) there is no other reason to acknowledge that the Plaintiff’s request for removal from office can be dismissed.