All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds of appeal in this case, the sentence (Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and confiscation, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

(2) On July 22, 201, Defendant B and the defense counsel agreed with the victim of the special larceny of this case on the following grounds: (a) Defendant B had been sentenced to 20 months of imprisonment for special larceny of this case and again committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated punishment after the completion of the execution of the sentence on July 22, 201; (b) Defendant B had been sentenced to 20 times of imprisonment for special larceny of this case; and (c) Defendant B had been sentenced to 20 times of punishment for Defendant A; and (d) Defendant B had been sentenced to 20 times of imprisonment for special larceny of this case on the following grounds: (a) Defendant B was subject to punishment for special larceny of this case, larceny of this case; and (b) the victims of assault of this case’s punishment; and (b) Defendant B did not appear to have committed any of the crimes of this case under the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act on June 3, 2011.

(On the other hand, the judgment of the court below is found to have omitted the determination of the assertion that Defendant A was in a state of mental disability at the time of committing each of the special larceny and attempted special larceny in this case. However, the circumstances and result of each of the crimes in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the judgment of the court below which can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below.