The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and imprisonment with labor for one year and six months) by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant does not repeat the crime of this case in a profound proportion to the crime of this case.

There is also a relatively small amount of damage suffered by the victims.

However, the defendant has already been punished several times as a crime of fraud, which is the same kind of crime.

On November 2, 2014, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes without being aware of the fact that he completed the execution of punishment for the same kind of crime and committed a crime on August 8, 201, which was committed during the period of repeated crime.

In light of the previous records that the defendant has repeatedly committed the crime immediately after the completion of the sentence, it seems that the opening of the crime is weak.

Each of the crimes of this case is committed against many and unspecified persons, and it is inevitable to punish the defendant with severe punishment due to the nature of the crime in light of the method, frequency, and period of the crime.

In addition, examining all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is clear that "the choice of punishment 1.." was omitted in the column subsequent to "the pertinent provision on the crime of 1.1." in part of the decision of the court below, the decision of the court below is added in accordance with Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, and it is corrected in