The judgment below

The guilty portion against Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

(b).

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A (unfair sentencing)’s sentence (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B (1) Of the facts charged against Defendant B, there was no intent to commit the act of deception and fraud, such as this part of the facts charged, with respect to each fraud against the victim AC and AJ, among the facts charged against Defendant B.

Although the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2) The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

(c)

1) Of the facts charged against the Defendants misunderstanding the facts, each fraud against the victim F, G, H, I, J, K, K, L, and M and each fraud against the victim Qu, R, S, T, U,V, and W among the facts charged against the Defendant A, the lower court acquitted the Defendants of this part of the facts charged, but the lower court acquitted the Defendants of this part of the facts charged. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2) The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing against the Defendants is too uncomfortable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal

A. The lower court found Defendant B guilty of each of the facts charged against Defendant AC and AJ among the facts charged against Defendant B by providing a detailed statement in the part of the judgment of the lower court regarding the “determination of the Defendants and their defense counsel’s assertion” and found Defendant B guilty of the fraud. In addition, the lower court’s judgment is just and acceptable, and in full view of all the following circumstances recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, it is recognized that Defendant B conspired with Defendant A, thereby deceiving the victim AC and AJ as stated in the judgment of the lower court, and acquired the security money for lease by deceiving the victim AC and AJ as pointed out by Defendant B.