1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the order of revocation shall be revoked.

1. This part of the grounds for the judgment is the same as the corresponding part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance (the corresponding part between 5 and 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance). Therefore, this part of the grounds for the judgment is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. This part of the judgment regarding the legitimacy of the instant first disposition is the same as the corresponding part of the grounds for the first instance judgment (from March 21 to May 8 of the first instance judgment), except for adding the following judgments to five pages 8 of the judgment of the first instance court. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The plaintiff notified the plaintiff that he could file an administrative appeal pursuant to the Administrative Appeals Act within 90 days from the notification while notifying the plaintiff of the result of the first disposition of this case. Thus, the plaintiff asserted that the lawsuit of this case was lawful within 90 days from the date on which the response to the above objection was delivered to the plaintiff pursuant to Article 20 (1) of the Administrative Litigation Act.

However, the defendant's response against the plaintiff's objection is merely to the purport that the defendant's own assistance in performing his/her duties and to improve the administrative operation by re-review the legitimacy of his/her own disposition. Thus, the plaintiff's objection cannot be viewed as an "instigation of an administrative appeal" under the Administrative Appeals Act, etc., which is stated in the notification of the result of the

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion cannot be accepted.

3. Whether the second disposition in this case is legitimate

A. The plaintiff's assertion;

B. This part of the relevant law is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (as to the fifth to Nine (19). Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(c) Determination 1) Each of the above quoted evidence and evidence Nos. 3, 6 through 11, and 14 (including each number, and the following recognized by adding the whole purport of the pleading to the whole purport of the pleading.