logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.03.16 2017고정1247
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is under the influence of alcohol,

1. On July 9, 2017, around Kimpo-si C and D around 18:45 around 18:45 around 2017, customers who walk up a bad fish group with the convenience store and let them out of the convenience store, and the victim E who worked at the above convenience store as the above convenience store with the large interest of the victim E, and interfere with the business of convenience store by force over about 10 minutes;

2. On August 13, 2017, at the same place around 13:49, interferes with the business of the victim in the same manner as paragraph 1;

3. interferes with the business of the victim at the same place around August 25, 2017 in the same manner as paragraph 1;

4. On August 26, 2017, around the same place, around 11:30, the victim, who was dissatisfied with the report filed by the injured person on the preceding police at the same place, was able to resist the victim’s act of operating convenience stores by force over about 30 minutes, such as: (a) the victim, who was dissatisfied with the complaint reported by the injured person on the preceding day at the police; (b) the victim, who was in the same place, was not a shotner; (c) the shotner, and the scarto’s parents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement made by the defendant on the second public trial date;

1. Application of the victim E’s statement protocol Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, the background, method and frequency leading to the crime of this case, and the criminal records of this case, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, method and frequency thereof,

arrow