beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 56,926,533 with respect to the Plaintiff, and 5% per annum from February 28, 2015 to August 28, 2020.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant B and the Plaintiff were employed by Defendant C, who sells building materials in the name of “E” in Jeonjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and Defendant B were in charge of material delivery duties and the Plaintiff’s inventory management duties, respectively. 2) In the former Special Metropolitan City District Court 2018 Godan2685, the above court found Defendant B guilty of criminal facts under the Defendant B on December 5, 2019 and sentenced Defendant B to six months of imprisonment without prison labor and two years of suspended execution. In the former Special Metropolitan City District Court 2019No1760, Apr. 28, 2020, Defendant B and the Prosecutor dismissed all appeals by Defendant B and the Prosecutor on July 3, 2020, Defendant B dismissed Defendant B’s appeal by Defendant B on July 3, 2015 to use the said materials at the end of 16:30 square meters on July 28, 2015.
In such cases, there was a duty of care to take care of the person engaged in driving of the fore vehicle, and to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system.
Nevertheless, Defendant B neglected to do so and did not discover the Plaintiff who was in the latter direction of the progress of Defendant B, and did not discover the Plaintiff who was in excess of the workplace club fee and the head of the workplace in the latter direction of Defendant B, and took the Plaintiff’s lower end with the back wheels of the said forevis.
As a result, Defendant B suffered from the Plaintiff’s injury, such as mination of the left-hand side flusium flusium by negligence in the course of business as above (hereinafter “instant accident”).
The decision was made.
3) Defendant C did not take necessary safety measures without educating Defendant B B of safety rules on the operation of the vehicle for which Defendant B had to drive the vehicle while carrying out the above material transport business on the date of the instant accident. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, and evidence Nos. 1 through 15, and evidence Nos. 12 (Additional Number) (No. 1).