The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant became a co-inheritors with the deceased’s mother, who was his/her spouse, and became the deceased’s mother.

Therefore, the Defendant arbitrarily prepared a written agreement on the division of inherited property in the name of E to the effect that he renounces the network D’s property, and tried to acquire the ownership in the name of the Defendant for five parcels, other than the F, E, whose name had been registered in the name of the network D.

1. On April 6, 2011, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the HH Certified Judicial Scriveners Office located in Ansan-si, G; (b) as to the inheritance commenced on February 20, 201 due to the death of the deceased on February 20, 201, the co-inheritors shall consult on the division of inherited property, as follows, by allowing I, who is unaware of the circumstances in charge of the registration of real estate, to prepare a written agreement on the division of inherited property.

1. Terms and conditions of consultation on division of inherited property;

1. 1,231 square meters before K in Ansan-si in Gyeonggi-do;

2. F Return 5,557 square meters in Ansan-si in Gyeonggi-do;

3. L field: 314 square meters;

4. M field: 254 square meters;

5. Natory-si in Gyeonggi-do 2,929 square meters;

6.O 575 square meters in Ansan-si in Gyeonggi-do;

1. The above real estate shall be owned by A from among co-inheritors;

2. He shall prepare this letter of agreement to certify the above consultation, and shall carry one copy with his name and seal affixed thereto; and

On April 6, 2011, JJ (P) of Gyeonggi-do, Hasung-si, Haak-si, Haak-si, Haak-si, Haak-si, JW-si, Haak-si, JW-si, Haak-si, and printed it, and then, after receiving from S in advance on the name next to the E's name, affixed the seal of E's name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights, the Defendant forged one copy of the agreement on division of inherited property in the name of E, a private document on the duty of rights.

2. On April 7, 2011, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document: (a) at the Suwon District Court, which was located in Suwon-dong 156-1, Suwon-dong, Suwon-si, the Defendant had the said I, who was unaware of the fact, an employee of the said registry office; (b) was duly constituted a forged written agreement on the division of inherited property.