Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. From July 5, 2012 to 17:50 on July 5, 2012, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) entered a e-cafeteria operated by the victim D, which was operated by the victim D in the Geum-gu, Busan, and ordered the payment of KRW 100.00 out of the price of KRW 100,000, out of 104.00, the Defendant paid it by the Defendant’s physical card; and (b) returned KRW 30,000 at the taxi expense, but the victim rejected it.

Therefore, the victim interfered with the victim's business by preventing other customers from running his/her business for one hour, such as emitting bitch of a bitch of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a year.

2. The Defendant damaged property by means of the fact that there is a large amount of approval at the same time and place as that set forth in paragraph 1, and that no part of the money is returned due to taxi expenses, etc., and that the money is closed so far.

Accordingly, the victim's market value at the bottom of the main visit (70 cm a.60 cm a.6 cm a.6 cm a.6 cm a.6 cm a.6 cm a.6 cm a.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of investigation reports (general), receipt copies, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;