The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The Defendant’s determination on the grounds for appeal (e.g., the grounds for appeal) is against the Defendant’s recognition of all of the instant crimes, and the fact that each of the instant traffic accidents caused by the Defendant is relatively minor is considered in favor of the Defendant.

However, the defendant had been punished several times of drinking and unlicensed driving, including previous criminal records, and the crime of this case does not take necessary measures despite the defendant's purchase of a crypted vehicle and without transfer of the name, and caused the first traffic accident while driving without obtaining a license under the mandatory insurance without obtaining a license, and the witness of the above traffic accident does not have to take any necessary measures, and the crime is not good because the defendant escaped without any measures again causing the second traffic accident leading to shock of the witness in the course of continuing escape after avoiding the defendant's attack, and the crime was committed without any measures. The blood alcohol concentration of the defendant at the time of the driving of this case reaches 0.238% at the time of the driving of this case, and exceeds about 10km, in violation of traffic regulations such as signal violation, illegal internship, etc. The defendant did not take various measures to recover from the age of the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor at the time of the crime, and the defendant did not take any other measures to punish him at least 0% of alcohol without a license-free driving under the name of another person.