Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2016, from around 14:00 to 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant took the mediation procedure between the victims in the Gwangju Dong-gu Criminal Mediation Office in relation to the injury case that the Defendant inflicted on the victim C at the 7-12 Compliance Office of Gwangju Dong-gu, but the mediation was completed due to differences in mutual opinion on the agreed amount.

In addition, the Defendant, around 16:10 on the same day, tried to move out of the office building, leading the victim's left arms by letting the victim talk at the rest area in front of the general public service center of the public service center.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Application of the witness C’s partial statutory statement statute

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사 소송법 제 334조 제 1 항 무죄 부분 이 부분 공소사실의 요지는, 피고인이 위 범죄사실 기재 일시, 장소에서 피해자의 왼뺨을 가볍게 때려 폭행하였다는 것이다.

The evidence consistent with this is that there was a statement in the victim's investigative agency and the testimony in the court. However, the following circumstances that can be known from the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the victim's 112 report at the time, and the list of 112 reported cases prepared after the police officer was dispatched to the site, there was no trace that the victim was "at all."

(2) The above 112 Report Processing List is deemed to be "meat"

The report contains the contents of the report, and the victim said that the defendant was "compactly" on his left side.

The statement made by the investigative agency, 3. The victim may know about CCTV when he testified in this court.

The CCTV is a evidence.