A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 4. 9. 01:13경 성남시 분당구 서현동 소재 주점에서 술을 마신 후 귀가하다가 부근에 있는 장안치안센터에 갔으나 그곳에 야간근무자가 배치되어 있지 아니하여 출입문이 잠겨있자 치안센터 간판에 기재되어 있는 D지구대의 전화번호를 보고 전화하여 D지구대 소속 경찰관에게 ‘파출소에서 자고 가야겠으니 문을 열어달라. 문을 안 열어줄 것이면 모텔비나 택시비를 내놔라. 서현동 뉴존사우나까지 태워달라’라고 요구하였으나 이를 거절당하자, 같은 날 01:17경 D지구대에 다시 전화하여 ‘빨리 와라. 씹할 새끼야. 가만두지 않겠다. 파출소를 부숴버리겠다’라고 말한 후 근처 화단에 있던 위험한 물건인 건축용 시멘트 블록을 들고 치안센터 출입문을 향해 약 3회 던져 공무소에서 사용하는 물건인 치안센터의 현관 유리문 및 CCTV 덮개를 파손하여 수리비 합계 약 55만원이 들도록 이를 손상하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, G, and H;

1. Each statement of H, G, and I;

1. Written estimate;

1. On-site and photographs of damaged objects, CCTV duplicating photographs, and photographs of crime tools;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 144 (1) and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act which choose a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant: (a) around 01:19 on April 9, 2014, the victim E and F, who was a police officer belonging to the D Zone Unit belonging to the branch of the branch police station of the branch police station, was able to hear the Ha and G, etc. before the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch police office located in Sung-nam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

p. Chewing guilia, which is suitable for the police.

v. N. S.C.

I would like to find out the number of dismissals.

(b).