The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C are between the plaintiff and the victim.

On December 16, 2017, from around 14:05 to 14:35 on the same day from around 16, 2017 to around 14:75 on the same day, the Defendant’s disturbance was avoided on the ground that the damaged person was promising the Defendant’s university registration fees to be paid at the intervals of the Plaintiff’s children, and the victim was released out of the Defendant, and the entrance of the private teaching institute was set free from the Defendant, and the Plaintiff returned to Korea without paying the registration fees.

If so, I will abandon it in this context.

(d) open the door.

“The victim interfered with the operation of the private teaching institute by force, such as interfering with the education of the students of the private teaching institute by opening the entrance and opening the entrance.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a CCTV image closure;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448, Apr. 2, 2006) (see, 201; Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448, Apr. 2, 20