logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.02.10 2017고정149
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On August 25, 2016, around 14:30 on Jeju Island, the Defendant driven a C vehicle owned by a good rental car owned by a Co., Ltd. at a point 500m of 500m in the face of the transmission of B B on August 25, 2016, and was in direct operation from the long distance of Taecheon-dong to the face of the transmission.

At the time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the speed limit and operating the steering gear and brake system accurately, because the speed limit is 60 km at every hour.

Nevertheless, the speed of restriction has been changed beyond 24 km every hour without neglecting it, and it has been separated from a grass field, and the telegraph has been shocked with the front side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the above passenger D, such as the right-to-hand flag, etc., which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment for the above passenger D, the injury to the same passenger E, the injury to the blood flag, etc., which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment for the same passenger E, the injury to the blood flag, etc., which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment for the same passenger E, and the injury to the same G, which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment for the same passenger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. A traffic accident analysis and appraisal report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a fine for selective punishment (the occurrence of four victims due to the traffic accident in this case, but considering the confession and reflectability of the defendant, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victims, and the fact that the defendant is the first offender);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow