The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On March 25, 2019, the Defendant, at around 19:26, visited B account, which is a social network service, and entered a false statement in B’s notice on the victim’s pro-enemy D, which does not mean that the victim C (the victim 27 years old) has stolen the Defendant’s goods. However, the Defendant written a written statement on the victim’s pro-enemy D, which is able to be seen by an unspecified number of people, including a statement on “CC is stolen and stolen and not returned, and a statement on contact may be taken off,” from March 26, 2019 to March 14:21, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 70 (3) and (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Disclosure, Etc.;

B. Declaration of non-existence of punishment: To submit to the court a written agreement on October 2, 2019 that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant after the prosecution of this case.

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;