1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts were designated by the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do on February 10, 209 as an urban development project area (hereinafter “instant urban development project”). D on March 27, 2009, the establishment of the E Urban Development Project Association (hereinafter “instant association”) was authorized. On July 31, 2009, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do approved the development plan for the instant urban development project on July 31, 2009.

D The Mayor approves the land substitution plan prepared by the instant association on March 12, 2014. The instant association, on March 28, 2014, designated the effective date of the designation of the land substitution plan as of April 29, 2014 when it designated and announced the land substitution plan under the land substitution plan on March 28, 2014, and publicly announced the compensation plan on April 6, 2014.

Article 36 of the Urban Development Act (Effect of Designation of Reserved Land for Replotting) (1) When reserved land for replotting is designated due to a reserved land for replotting for the land owned by the plaintiff, the owner of the previous land and the rights of lease holders, etc. may exercise the same rights as those of the previous land for replotting from the effective date of designation of reserved land for replotting to the date of public announcement of replotting disposition, and the previous land shall not

(3) Where the designation of reserved land for replotting takes effect or use of such land or profit therefrom commences under paragraph (2), the previous owners or lease holders, etc. of the reserved land for replotting shall take place during the period prescribed by paragraph (1) or (2).