beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On February 1, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Daegu District Court’s support, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Net Prison on September 17, 2015. On June 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the same court and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 28, 2017.
Defendant is not a narcotics handler.
On January 4, 2017, from around 19:00 to around 22:00, the Defendant received cash of 200,000 won from C at an insular place located in Ansan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, and sold the mephone to C, which is a local mental medicine.
2. The prosecutor's examination of the facts charged of this case is examined as evidence of witness D's statement in this court and the statement or statement of suspect interrogation in the investigative agency, copies of the statement or statement of suspect interrogation in this court, each currency statement, digital evidence analysis response, etc. as well as investigation report (E-related, etc.), copy of investigation report (C mobile phone analysis report), investigation report (C mobile phone analysis report), investigation report (verification of suspect A's carrying number), investigation report (C mobile phone identification), investigation report (C court's attachment), investigation report (related to confirmation of actual use of suspect A's cellphone), investigation report (A and C's telephone identification), investigation report (written phone identification of suspect A and witness A and C), investigation report (written confirmation of financial transactions between suspect A and witness C), and the facts charged of this case by the evidence of this case.
First of all, the purpose of the witness D’s statement in this legal and investigative agency is that D and C have administered the penphones purchased by C from January 4, 2017 to January 22:00, and D have claimed from C to F (the Defendant’s name).
“The words were written.”
In doing so, such D's objection.