Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2012, from around 21:30 to 21:45 of the same day, the Defendant, along with D, E, and F, carried out a card by dividing seven by using the card 52 from the office of “I real estate” in Gangwon-gu G, the Defendant used the card in the 52 card, and then, if the card and the card number or pattern, which the remainder of the card, are finally low, and then the remaining number of the card is equal, and then the sum of KRW 1,95,00 in the form of “hululh” was added to the sum of KRW 1,95,00 in the form of payment in sequence from the person whose number is low, and approximately 10 times in the form of “hulhhh”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness H in the court;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (Attachment to a photograph of dynamic image);

1. Relevant Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 246 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant's act of this case is limited to the extent of temporary recreation, and the seizure of this case is improper.

In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, it is reasonable to view that the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, which were seized, was provided or intended to be provided for the instant gambling with the possession of the defendant. The following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, namely, the fact that the defendant and the participants of the instant gambling had been punished several times prior to the instant crime, the seized gambling fund reaches 20 million won, and other circumstances that led to the instant crime, etc., it is reasonable to view that the Defendant’s gambling act exceeds the extent of temporary entertainment.

As such, it can be seen.