The defendant is guilty of each of the following facts: (a) 1-1 to 23 of the daily list of crimes in annexed 2; and (b) 2-1 of the list of crimes in annexed 2-1.

Punishment of the crime

On April 14, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months with prison labor for a crime of false accusation at the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court, and on April 22, 2005, the above judgment was finalized on April 22, 2005 (hereinafter “the judgment”), and on April 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months with prison labor for a crime of violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, and on April 24, 2005, the above judgment (hereinafter “the judgment of violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act”) became final and conclusive.

Ⅰ. The Defendant, from June 25, 2004, concluded a check contract under the name of the same branch of Han Bank and the Defendant, a representative director, and traded the check.

From May 12, 2005 to July 21, 2006, the Defendant issued four copies of each check over four occasions in total, as shown in the attached Table 1 to the 5 to 8th June 28, 2006, including the issuance of one check in the name of the above company on August 30, 2006, in the above D office E, “the amount of the check” 2,680,920 won, “the date of issuance,” and the issuance of one check in the name of the above company on August 30, 2006. The Defendant issued four copies of each check over four occasions from the date of the annexed crime No. 1 to June 28, 2006, while the holder of the said check presented the said bank the payment of the check within the period of payment, but did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Ⅱ As the victim H Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of selling video products, “2015 high group 1340 G G” was a person engaged in the business of storing a promissory note, etc. while working as a director in charge of finance from April 16, 1997 to October 31, 2006, and was engaged in the business of issuing a promissory note. Since the financial situation of the Defendant, the Defendant, who is the Defendant’s Defendant, is difficult to do so, was issued a promissory note in the name of the victim’s company and received a request for a discount and accepted it.

1. He does not know that, as in April 6, 2005, he had forged L/C securities at the above H image Pidi office located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul.