logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.01.26 2016가단38407
공사대금
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

Plaintiff’s assertion

The plaintiff is a person awarded a contract from the defendant company for the installation of a new facility among B construction works. The sn beamline's sn beamer than the original contract terms has increased, and the defendant company will pay additional costs.

In addition, the period of use of temporary facilities has increased.

Therefore, the Defendant Company is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 44,558,990 as additional construction cost.

Judgment

However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone reveals that the Plaintiff added additional construction beyond the scope stipulated in the contract, and that the Defendant Company agreed to pay the additional construction cost to the Plaintiff, and it is insufficient to recognize the specific amount of additional expenses due to the increase in the period of use of the provisional installation. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim cannot be accepted.

arrow