A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution on June 28, 2012 by imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (Habitual Injury) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Support, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 20, 2012. However, the sentence of suspension of execution was revoked on November 8, 2014, and on November 26, 2014, the said judgment became final and conclusive on the same day on the same day as the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for an injury and the said judgment was final and conclusive on April 19, 2017.

[Criminal facts] 2018 Highest 78

1. On February 3, 2018, around 03:10, the injured Defendant: (a) at the victim D’s house located in the north-gu Office C building 303 in the north-gu Office of Mapo-gu, Mapo-si; (b) on the ground that the victim was satisfing himself; (c) the victim expressed the victim’s desire to “any person is unsatched; (d) the victim’s head satisfy; and (e) the victim satisfys the victim’s head satisfy; and (e) the victim satched the victim’s body satisfy that requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment; and (e) the victim satch satfy, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim by taking advantage of the victim.

2. On February 3, 2018, the Defendant refused to leave from around 03:10 to 03:50, the Defendant refused to sit at the house despite the demand from the injured party to “from the house” in subparagraph 303 of the said C building, and “from the house”.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave without justifiable reasons.

"2018 Highest 334"

1. On August 15, 2017, while the Defendant damaged property, at around 23:20 on August 15, 2017, the victim G used “F” main toilets located in Gumi-si, Gumi-si, “F”, the Defendant committed a gold test on the ground that the victim G opened a toilet door.

“In doing so, the public toilet door was sent back to drinking, and the public toilet door was damaged to the extent of KRW 2.50,000,000, which is the victim’s possession.

2. The Defendant interfering with his duties is the same as the description in paragraph 1 at the point of “F” above at the time of the day specified in paragraph 1.