1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from August 11, 2016 to December 7, 2016.

According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiff leased from the Defendant on August 5, 2014 with the lease deposit of KRW 301,00,000,000 and two years of lease, and the delivery of the above subparagraph 401 to the Defendant on August 10, 2016. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the lease deposit of KRW 30,000,000 as well as the lease deposit of KRW 30,000 from August 11, 2016, the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order from August 7, 2016 to December 7, 2016, the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order of KRW 50,000 as provided by the Civil Act, and the damages for delay calculated by 15% per annum as provided by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.

As to this, the defendant asserts to the effect that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's claim for the return of the total amount of the lease deposit remains due to the existence of the money to be settled between the plaintiff and the above lease contract, but there is no specific evidence of proof related thereto, so the

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.