1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an incorporated association with the aim of promoting the publication, etc. of publications related to culture and arts. Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant school foundation”) is a school foundation operating D University, etc., and Defendant B and C is a professor of cultural industry, art, sports, and universities at D University.

B. The Plaintiff: (a) divided the 41 person’s intangible cultural heritage discharged at Jeonju-si into the functional sector and the artistic sector; and (b) published “E” (hereinafter “the publication of this case”) to intangible cultural heritage, including the relevant information and visual photography.

C. Around December 5, 2015, the Defendants issued “F, including the information on intangible cultural heritage in the part of the function at Jeonju.”

In December 2015, the Defendants held an event to exhibit cultural heritage works in the field of craft in the name of “G” in the gallongalian of D University D University.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion falls under photographic works, fish problem crops, and compilation works under the Copyright Act. The Defendants used the same book size as the publication of this case regarding the function of intangible cultural heritage among the publication of this case, and used photographs arrangement, text editing and background color used in the publication of this case, etc. The Plaintiff’s publication of this case’s publication of this case’s publication of this case’s publication of this case’s publication of this case’s publication of this case’s publication of this case’s publication of this case’s publication of this case’s publication without permission, and infringed Plaintiff’s publication right, reproduction right, compilation copyright, and display right by displaying it to the public using the above F.

Defendant B was the issuer of F, Defendant C was the design and manufacturing manager, Defendant C was the issuer, and Defendant School Foundation committed such joint tort as above.

Therefore, the Defendants jointly damage the Plaintiff’s reputation, honor, and credit, with the cost of publication of the publication of this case KRW 35 million, and damage from reproduction and display of photographs KRW 135 million.