The Defendant’s appeal against the Intervenor is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendant and the Intervenor’s Intervenor as to the acceptance of the judgment of the first instance are not significantly different from the contents of the Defendant and the Intervenor’s Intervenor’s allegation in the first instance court, and the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court are justifiable even if this assertion is re-examineed with the evidence submitted

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

(1) The Defendant’s Intervenor asserts that the instant lease agreement was concluded as a joint intermediary between the Defendant’s Intervenor and Nonparty H, the representative of G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, and that the Plaintiff ought to proceed with co-litigations against the Defendant’s Intervenor and H. However, the instant claim is not a claim against the Defendant’s Intervenor, but a claim against the Defendant who entered into a guarantee insurance contract with the Defendant’s Intervenor, and thus, the Defendant’s appeal against the Defendant’s Intervenor is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.