logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2015.05.20 2015고단78
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving a rocketing car;

On January 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at around 16:20, while driving it along the two-lane road in front of the E in order to move along, from the parallel of the name of the Defendant, along the two-lane road and the one-lane road from the parallel of the name of the Defendant.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely operating the person engaged in driving service with a duty of care to live well in the front, rear, and left and right.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, neglecting and proceeding in the front bank, the Gamburged passenger vehicle of FJ in the atmosphere signal at the front of the road was received from the Defendant’s driving to the right-hand part of the Gamburged passenger vehicle at the front of the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as seen above, sustained injury to the victim He (n, 33 years of age) who was taking advantage of the said FF driver’s hurged car, such as a shurd salt shurbing for about three weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the said hurged car owned by the victim F to be in excess of KRW 380,906, but failed to immediately stop and take measures such as providing relief to the victim.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as a holder of C Launa car that is not covered by mandatory insurance, was driving the car at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant operated a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The actual survey report and photographs concerning traffic accidents;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Mobile phone photographs or cell phone image CDs;

1. Written estimate;

1. A medical certificate;

arrow