A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 6, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months for fraud in the Gwangju District Court Branch Branch of Gwangju District Court for a period of 2 years. On June 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and a fine of 1 million won for fraud in the same support, and the said suspended sentence was revoked, and the execution of each of the above suspended sentence was terminated on February 6, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around September 03:25, 2014, the Defendant driven C cargo under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of about 0.130% from the 5km section from the front side of the Gwangju metropolitan bank in the west-gun, Namnam-gun, Gwangju Metropolitan City to the front side of the same military Masan-si, Musan-si, and the front side of the same military Masan-si.

2. On September 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 03:25 on September 9, 2014, 2014, while driving a road in front of the mountain Masan-ri Simsan-ri, Namnam-gun, the Defendant caused a traffic accident involving DNA excavationers parked along the above cargo lane; and (b) accordingly, the Defendant was sent back to the emergency hospital of the South-Namnam-do, South-Namnam-do, where there is an injury, and then the Defendant was sent back to the emergency hospital of the South-Namnam-do.

At that time, the Defendant was asked for a drinking test by F, who was asked by F, who was in charge of performing a drinking test at the place, to pay a fine. The Defendant saw that the Defendant was serving as G, who was the Defendant’s punishment.

On September 9, 2014, around 04:27, the Defendant responded to the alcohol measurement by the above police officers, confirmed the blood alcohol concentration of 0.130%, and stated “G” in the column of the driver’s name of the report on detection of drinking drivers and the circumstantial statement of drinking drivers, which was presented by the above police officers, and submitted to the above police officers as if they were genuinely established.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;