The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

The defendant is a person who has overall control over the affairs of the company while serving as a joint representative director or a single representative director of the company B for the purpose of manufacturing and selling cosmetics.

On November 201, the Defendant decided to manufacture and sell d/ E, etc. of the executive officers of the company at the head office of the Dong office of the Seo-gu Daejeon 8th floor B, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and the board of directors, and had the head office of the business management team and the vice headF take charge of the manufacturing business.

F was supplied to the H (State) representative I, who manufactured and sold the G’s decoration in 750 won per unit with the name of “J” attached to H (State) executives of H (State), who made and sold the instant decoration in 30,000 won including 20,000 won on November 1, 201, and 333,00 won on March 15, 201 (value of KRW 30,000,000,000, value of KRW 30,000,000,000 won (value of KRW 30,000,000,000) from the head office and location of the head office, located in the Daejeon Stock Company, Daejeon, with the approval of its executives.

However, on September 6, 2012, the Patent Court Decision 2012No. 5936 decided that “G” was a product that is similar to the product that the injured K, a patentee, registered as NM, and that “G” was a product that infringes on K’s patent by falling under the scope of the patent right of the patented invention registered by K and thus, “G” was sentenced to the judgment that “G” infringed on the patent right of the injured party, and “G” was sentenced to the judgment that “G” would be appropriate to suspend the sale of “J” manufactured similar to “G”. On November 28, 2012, the Defendant and “B” from the injured party that “B corporation sells at its agency,” and thus, ceased to infringe on the patent right of the injured party.”