Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2020 01:12 on October 2, 2020, the Defendant is a taxi engineer, a passenger, and a preceding taxi engineer at the Southern-dong Team in Gangseo-gu, Gangnam-gu.

On the same day, the 112-report of the 01:48 of the same day is received, and the 01:48 of the 01:0,000, the 1112-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day

“On the receipt of the report 112, the police officer did not inform his/her personal information, address, etc. under the influence of alcohol even though he/she was recommended to return home from the police station C District of Gangnam Police Station C, and was taken protective measures to be taken by the police station C District of Gangnam Police Station in 02:30 on the same day.

From that time until October 2, 2020, the Defendant had been drunkd in the said C District from the time until October 2, 2020. The Defendant was unable to resist the disturbance, and the Defendant was able to have the parent of the Defendant returned to the Defendant on the back seat of the patrol vehicle to the Defendant in order for the Defendant to have the Defendant returned to the patrol vehicle using the patrol vehicle, the Defendant was able to have the Defendant walked on the back seat of the patrol vehicle, saying, “hing the glass,” and carried the glass, etc. of the patrol vehicle by drinking and launchinging the drinking, etc. The Defendant was able to have the captain, the Defendant opened the front back of the patrol vehicle, and the Defendant, by pushing the back of the patrol vehicle with the rear door of the patrol vehicle, was faced with the Defendant on the chest and on the part of the H’s chest, and H “h is a new fright in this case.”

“Blue the blue theory” and assaulted H who is a police official, such as the blue part of H’s breast part once, the blue part of H’s breast part once, and the blue part of H’s breast part once.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police made by the defendant to H in the court;

1. Application of the investigation report (Attachment of CCTV images inside and outside the C District), Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is limited to the police officer of the defendant for the reason of sentencing.