1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From March 28, 2015, KRW 6,900,00 and the above.

On September 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) leased the building listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff as KRW 10 million; (b) the rent of KRW 600,000,000 for the lease deposit; and (c) the period from September 28, 2014 to September 27, 2016; (b) agreed to pay the Plaintiff the overdue rent of KRW 3.9 million between the former owner; and (c) around that time, the said building was delivered to the Plaintiff; (d) the Defendant did not pay the rent of KRW 3 million in total as of March 27, 2015; and (e) the fact that the overdue rent of KRW 2,00,000 was not paid by the Defendant, and thus, there is no dispute between the parties.

According to the above facts, the above lease contract was lawfully terminated pursuant to Article 640 of the Civil Act, on or around April 13, 2015, on the ground that the overdue charge falls on two occasions, and the copy of the complaint of this case, stating the intention of termination, was delivered to the Defendant. The Defendant pays the Plaintiff the overdue charge of KRW 3.9 million incurred between the former owner as stipulated in the above lease agreement, so the Defendant delivers the above building to the Plaintiff. In addition, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the overdue charge of KRW 6.9 million (=the overdue charge of the Plaintiff with the former owner KRW 3.9 million), and the amount of overdue charge from March 28, 2015 to March 28, 2015, calculated at the rate of KRW 600,000 per month or the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.