logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.25 2015고단2722
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of suspended execution on two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) at the Busan District Court on February 21, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 21, 2014, and is currently under suspended execution and five times of

【Criminal Facts】

At around 08:40 on May 15, 2015, the Defendant, in the office of “D” located in Busan, the business director of the said company, was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s complaint that the business director of the said company did not properly pay business allowances, and the Defendant, on the ground that he neglected his living together with the telephone for the purpose of ascertaining the reason, committed a knife (20cm in total length, 10cm in length in knife) which is a dangerous object prepared in advance, was knifeed by the Defendant, and knife the victim’s face.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (previous records and investigation reports);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] is the case where the crime is committed by the threat of organization or the majority (excluding the case where special violence is applied] under the same kind of force (excluding the case where special violence is applied). In particular, it is a second offense during the period of probation, it is not agreed with the victim, it is considered as an unfavorable sentencing factor against the contents and risk of the crime of this case, and the circumstances leading to and against the crime of this case are being committed.

arrow