Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On May 12, 2009, the defendant issued a summary order of 2.5 million won for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's net support on May 12, 2009, as well as the issuance of a fine of 2.5 million won.

1. Around April 16, 2020, the Defendant driving a motor bicycle on the front side of the Gyeongsung-gun (U.S.) without obtaining the driver’s license to drive the motor bicycle on April 6, 2020.

2. On April 6, 2020, at around 17:34, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the noise measurement) (hereinafter referred to as “Absent test”), the Defendant was required to comply with a drinking test by inserting the alcohol measuring devices at intervals of about five minutes, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as: (a) the Bosong Police Station Dental Police Station Dox, which was called after having received a traffic accident report at the emergency room of the Bossung-gun C Hospital; (b) the slope E, the Inspector, and the suspect; and (c) the 119 first responded to the scene; and (d) the 119 first responded to the scene, despite the fact that the person who reported the traffic accident, is clear to have driven the vehicle,

Nevertheless, the Defendant, “I am a woman with the knife and knife of the knife of the knife” and “I am a knife of the knife,” and did not comply with the police officer’s request for a drinking test without good cause

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving or drinking refusal to take a drinking test more than twice.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of a motor bicycle 49 cc. without a license plate attached.

No owner of a motor vehicle shall operate any motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above motorcycle which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1...