beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a doctor who operated E member in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.
1. At around 11:00 on March 30, 2009, the Defendant injured by occupational negligence: (a) against the victim FF (the age of 32) who was frighted in order to raise the lower part of the E members of the E members of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E-member of the E-member of the E-member of the E-member of the E-member of the e-mail to put the e-mail into the patient’s e-mail by inserting the e-mail to the patient’s e-mail in accordance with the e-mail shape; and (b) discharged the
When the Defendant, as a doctor who was in charge of surgery, senseed the pressure roof inserted in a blick in a blicking body, he had due pressure so that blood circulation does not decline by sheshesheshesheshesheshesheshes and pressure, and when the blicks are pressured by sheshesheshesheshes and shes to patients, she could have a blick in the blick. Therefore, when there is serious pain on the part of this part, the Defendant has a duty of care to notify the above E member of the hospital or the nearest hospital that he/she should be given medical treatment or to be given the pressure cycle by she himself/herself.
Nevertheless, the defendant did not regulate robbery and sensed the pressure roof of the victim's body, and then, the victim explains that the Mama's pain is frequently caused by the merger, but without explaining the above precautions, the victim was released.
The Defendant, due to such occupational negligence, caused the victim’s blood cycle of this part of the body, thereby undermining the victim’s blood cycle of this part, thereby causing the victim’s injury, such as pressure duplicating and husheing the victim on both sides of the treatment days.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Medical Service Act is not a anesthesia doctor while running the anesthesia for the above surgery against the victim at the above time and place.