logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2021.01.08 2019가합113315
손해배상(기)
Text

Defendant D’s year from July 3, 2017 to November 26, 2019 to KRW 18,084,616 to Plaintiff B Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties concerned, Plaintiff A prime trial company (hereinafter “A”) and Plaintiff B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) are companies aimed at each mine development business, etc., Defendant C took overall control of all the duties of the branch offices of Korea as the head of the Plaintiffs’ Korean branch office. Defendant D, as the head of the said Korean branch office, was in charge of all the duties of the company under the direction of Defendant C.

B. Each illegal act against the Defendants and criminal judgment 1) Defendant D attempted to use the Plaintiffs’ funds for personal purposes while in the course of their business management. From November 5, 2015 to July 3, 2017, Defendant D voluntarily withdrawn and embezzled KRW 223,150,349 (hereinafter “instant embezzlement”) and then released KRW 2,859,474 in total from May 9, 2016 to December 9, 2017, and embezzled KRW 2,859,74 (hereinafter “Defendant C’s imprisonment”) with labor for 30 years from the Seoul District Court’s embezzlement and 30 years from 200 to 345 times (hereinafter “the Defendants’ imprisonment with labor for 20 years”) with the Defendants’ intent to use the Plaintiff’s funds as the Defendant’s business embezzlement during the course of their business management (hereinafter “the Defendants’ imprisonment with labor for 30 years from 16, 2016 to 34, 2016”).

(c)

The Defendants’ partial return details 1) Defendant D returned to Plaintiff B KRW 205,065,733 out of the amount of embezzlement No. 1 and KRW 2,144,727,707 out of the amount of embezzlement No. 2.

2) Defendant C returned to the Plaintiff KRW 60,313,177 out of the amount of 3 embezzlement. Defendant C and the Plaintiff agreed to offset the retirement allowance of KRW 9,430,260 against the amount of 3 embezzlement that Defendant C would have received while retiring the Plaintiff B. The Plaintiff A and the Plaintiff Company F in the name of the Plaintiff.

arrow